next up previous
Next: About this document

The Mutilated Checkerboard in Set Theory

John McCarthy
Computer Science Department
Stanford University
jmc@cs.stanford.edu
http://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/

February 28, 1996

An 8 by 8 checkerboard with two diagonally opposite squares removed cannot be covered by dominoes each of which covers two rectilinearly adjacent squares. We present a set theory description of the proposition and an informal proof that the covering is impossible. While no present system that I know of will accept either the formal description or the proof, I claim that both should be admitted in any heavy duty set theory.gif

We have the definitions

  equation9

  equation12

  equation16

and

  equation24

If we are willing to be slightly tricky, we can write more compactly

  equation30

but then the proof might not be so obvious to the program.

Next we have.

  equation33

Theorem:

  equation43

Proof:

We define

  equation49

  equation52

  equation60

  equation67

and finally

  equation75

Q.E.D.





John McCarthy
Wed Feb 28 19:43:17 PST 1996