The CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics gives the concentrations in milligrams per kilogram of elements in Earth's crust. We chose iron and the five metals of the 1980-1990 Ehrlich-Simon bet.
To apply formula (4) we need to use the concentrations by weight given in the Handbook to compute the mole fractions of the ores of the elements in the table in earth's crust. However, we don't know the average molecular weight of the earth's crust. The earth's crust is 57 percent SiO , which has molecular weight 60, so let's take that as the average, although maybe it should be larger. We also don't know what molecules the elements of interest are found in, but the only thing that matters for the purpose of computing their mole fractions is how many atoms of the particular element are in a molecule. We make the more conservative assumption is that there is one atom per molecule, e.g. we are assuming FeO rather than Fe O . The mole fraction of the ore of an element can then be obtained by multiplying its mass fraction by
We also must decide on a temperature at which we imagine the extractions to take place. We have chosen 1000 degrees Kelvin as the temperature--for lack of anything better and for the benefit of the arithmetic. Then (4) gives the energy required to extract one mole of the mineral containing the element. We assume that the energy costs $.05 per kilowatt hour, and this enables us to compare the second law part of the cost of extracting the mineral from random rock with the 1990 price of the element.
These calculations are summarized in the table:
One might imagine that the cost could be reduced by refrigerating the mixture, performing the separation, and then heating up the results. The second law of thermodynamics is proof against such tricks, so I suppose the specific heat of separated materials would be enough larger than the specific heat of the mixture so that the procedure wouldn't win. It would be a different story if the cooling and the subsequent warming were free because of the existence of heat reservoirs of the desired temperatures, but then we would be getting the energy of separation essentially by running a heat engine between these two temperatures.
There are also energy costs associated with breaking the chemical bonds associated the minerals. These are proportional to the amount of mineral extracted provided that, as is often the case, mechanical separation of some kind can be used to concentrate the ore. The Second Law costs discussed in this article are partly included in the ore concentration costs.
In short, the claim that second law costs will do us in is nonsense.
Up to main sustainability page